By Zhang Hui
Published: Jan 19, 2021 09:05 PM
“Countries such as Australia, which is expected to soon give the green light to Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine for use in elderly people, need to suspend their approval procedures to wait for the World Health Organization (WHO) and Norway to investigate deaths in Norway, Chinese health experts said.
“They said that for mass vaccination programs, Australia should broaden its choices of COVID-19 vaccines, such as purchasing Chinese-produced inactivated vaccines.
“The deaths of 23 elderly Norwegian people after receiving the vaccine have raised concern in Australia. Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt has been in contact with the Australian medical regulator, Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), “requesting that it seek additional information, both from the company and the Norwegian medical regulator,” Australian media reported.”
Full article at link above.
My comments: toward the end of the article, it is pointed out that Australia is in the middle of its summer season, and this is a time period when corona viruses become weakened to the point of dormancy, and are less likely to be transmitted.
So once again, when we examine the COVID vaccine situation using the most important aspect regarding decisions about the use or non-use of medical treatment: here is the scoop:
According to the risk vs benefit principle, the elderly in Australia are much less likely to get the COVID infection right now. The vaccine itself, according to the WHO, is primarily a method of tamping down the visible symptoms. The WHO has stated that vaccine does not stop the transmission of the COVID virus, nor does it stop an individual from developing a serious case of the infection. All it is actually known to do is to make the symptoms milder and less apparent.
It does seem like the Australian government is best off waiting it out and seeing what is ruled by The WHO, and perhaps also looking to Norway. Norway is now involved in having its researchers figure out the risk vs benefit rating of the COVID vaccine after 22 nursing home residents were killed by the vaccine, in one single nursing home there.
Similar death counts have occurred in the USA. In both California and New York nursing homes there have also been more than 20 residents die within short order after being injected by the COVID vaccine. But since our health care system has clearly been purchased outright by BillGates/Big Pharma, the deaths are treated as coincidental.
Robert F Kennedy Jr took the NYC lockdowns last year as a rare opportunity to examine the way that the lack of vaccinations for babies and toddlers affected their morbidity rate. He discovered that there was a significant decline in the number of SIDS diagnosed deaths during the time period when people were not able to get their offspring into the pediatricians’ offices for their jabs.
It should be relatively easy for some health official in the USA to go about collating the number of deaths in the period of 2014 to 2019, prior to COVID and the vaccine, to figure out if the count of over 20 elderly patients in any given nursing home is indeed an indication that our frail elderly should not be given these experimental vaccines. (A conclusion that some in the Norwegian government were openly expressing.)
Meanwhile I came across this excellent letter by Mr Kennedy that lays out in full all the many concerns about the COVID vaccines that Kennedy knows someone somewhere should be answering for.
Although the letter was written in hopes that perhaps it would stem the rush to approve the COVID vaccines under an emergency approval process, and that clearly did not come to pass, nonetheless, the many concerns that are brought up are worth considering by anyone who will be in charge of having their elderly relative have the vaccine, or their children, or themselves.