Chinese health experts advise Australia to halt approval for Pfizer vaccine following Norwegian deaths

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202101/1213297.shtml
By Zhang Hui
Published: Jan 19, 2021 09:05 PM

“Countries such as Australia, which is expected to soon give the green light to Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine for use in elderly people, need to suspend their approval procedures to wait for the World Health Organization (WHO) and Norway to investigate deaths in Norway, Chinese health experts said.

“They said that for mass vaccination programs, Australia should broaden its choices of COVID-19 vaccines, such as purchasing Chinese-produced inactivated vaccines.

“The deaths of 23 elderly Norwegian people after receiving the vaccine have raised concern in Australia. Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt has been in contact with the Australian medical regulator, Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), “requesting that it seek additional information, both from the company and the Norwegian medical regulator,” Australian media reported.”

Full article at link above.

My comments: toward the end of the article, it is pointed out that Australia is in the middle of its summer season, and this is a time period when corona viruses become weakened to the point of dormancy, and are less likely to be transmitted.

So once again, when we examine the COVID vaccine situation using the most important aspect regarding decisions about the use or non-use of  medical treatment: here is the scoop:

According to the risk vs benefit principle, the elderly in Australia are much less likely to get the COVID infection right now. The vaccine itself, according to the WHO, is primarily a method of tamping down the visible symptoms. The WHO has stated that vaccine does not stop the transmission of the COVID virus, nor does it stop an individual from developing a serious case of the infection. All it is actually known to do is to make the symptoms milder and less apparent.

It does seem like the Australian government is best off waiting it out and seeing what is ruled by The WHO, and perhaps also looking to Norway. Norway is now involved in having its researchers figure out the risk vs benefit rating of the COVID vaccine after 22 nursing home residents were killed by the vaccine, in one single nursing home there.

Similar death counts have occurred in the USA. In both California and New York  nursing homes there have also been more than 20 residents die within short order after being injected by the COVID vaccine. But since our health care system has clearly been purchased outright by BillGates/Big Pharma, the deaths are treated as coincidental.

Robert F Kennedy Jr took the NYC lockdowns last year as a rare opportunity to examine the way that the lack of vaccinations for babies and toddlers affected their morbidity rate. He discovered that there was a significant decline in the number of SIDS diagnosed deaths during the time period when people were not able to get their offspring into the pediatricians’ offices for their jabs.

It should be relatively easy for some health official in the USA to go about collating the number of deaths in the period of 2014 to 2019, prior to COVID and the vaccine, to figure out if the count of over 20 elderly patients in any given nursing home is indeed an indication that our frail elderly should not be given these experimental vaccines. (A conclusion that some in the Norwegian government were openly expressing.)

Meanwhile I came across this excellent letter by Mr Kennedy that lays out in full all the many concerns about the COVID vaccines that Kennedy knows someone somewhere should be answering for.

Although the letter was written in hopes that perhaps it would stem the rush to approve the COVID vaccines under an emergency approval process, and that clearly did not come to pass, nonetheless, the many concerns that are brought up are worth considering by anyone who will be in charge of having their elderly relative have the vaccine, or their children, or themselves.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/CHD_Letter_FDA_Dr_Marks.pdf?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=169f1c9f-732e-43a4-a90d-947de93de545&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=169f1c9f-732e-43a4-a90d-947de93de545

0
0
Bookmark the permalink.

5 Comments

  1. Given that China is involved, it’s hard to tell if this is a bonafide warning or merely disinformation. I read about the Norwegian deaths a while back; it was a contributing factor to selling my Pfizer holdings. However, the involvement of ChiComs does not strengthen the case for concern over the Pfizer vaccine. It could signal the opposite. Given that, I’d treat the Chinese warning as neutral.

    0
    0
  2. drlorentz:
    Given that China is involved, it’s hard to tell if this is a bonafide warning or merely disinformation. I read about the Norwegian deaths a while back; it was a contributing factor to selling my Pfizer holdings. However, the involvement of ChiComs does not strengthen the case for concern over the Pfizer vaccine. It could signal the opposite. Given that, I’d treat the Chinese warning as neutral.

    I agree. I like staying in the loop – but how does any individual know what it means?

    I fell asleep before I got around to posting about all the European nations that are banning the vaccine out of the UK. I also intend making a post about the Swiss banning Astra Zeneca.
    And again, what does that mean? If there are safety concerns, that is one thing, but for all I know vaccines are being banned based on inter-nation agreements.

    So if Belgium is tied into France’s vaccine program, as is the case with the GSK vax adjuvant program tying into a French vax program, it benefits both those nations to slam Great Britain’s vaccine efforts. How can I, as a mere mortal, tell if any ban is actually based on understanding a health flaw in one vaccine over the other, or is instead related to protecting a national concern’s monetary growth?

    0
    0
  3. I fortunately have limited history with the health care system. I would expect that if I go to get a vaccine I would be told… based on your health situation (age, weight, heart condition etc) here is your risks with COVID and here are your risks with the vaccine. What do you want to do? I wouldn’t take a drug if the doctor/pharmacist didn’t explain the side effects. Even the commercials include the risks. Improves your arthritis. Side effects include death, loss of hearing, blindness. Ask your doctor before taking it.

    After reading Risk Savy, I am not sure I trust a doctor to be able to correctly inform me of my risks.

    0
    0
  4. JTOmland: I would expect that if I go to get a vaccine I would be told… based on your health situation (age, weight, heart condition etc) here is your risks with COVID and here are your risks with the vaccine. What do you want to do?

    I would think that you’ll be greeted with a shout of NEXT! and ushered out the back with the same cry.

    0
    0
  5. BDB: I would think that you’ll be greeted with a shout of NEXT! and ushered out the back with the same cry.

    Yes, that is standard operating procedure. Med personnel treat us like cattle thee days.
    My spouse also got hit up with the suggestion he needed a flu shot when he was being admitted to the hospital for a ruptured appendix. The nurse never even asked if he had the flu yet. (It was May of 2019 – not a prime time to even get the flu.) I declined the shot on his behalf. I know Jonas Salk stated no one should be getting jabbed if they are ill. He was extremely ill when this know nothing nurse tried to suggest he needed the flu shot.

    0
    0

Comments are closed